U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Skip to Content

Department of Health and Human Services

Office of Inspector General -- AUDIT

"Review of the Administration and Oversight of the Community Services Block Grant Program by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico's Department of Family, Administration for Families and Children" (A-02-96-02004)

February 13, 1998


Complete Text of Report is available in PDF format (1.06 MB). Copies can also be obtained by contacting the Office of Public Affairs at 202-619-1343.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This report provides the results of our review of the administration and oversight of the community services block grant program by the commonwealth of Puerto Rico's Department of the Family, Administration for Families and Children during the period October 1, 1994 through September 30, 1996. Before July 1995, the Office of Services to Children and Community Development, (SENDEC), under the Office of the Governor, was responsible for the administration and oversight of the Puerto Rico Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) program. As a result of a reorganization in July 1995, SENDEC was renamed the Administration for Families and Children (AFAN) and transferred to the newly created Department of the Family (former Department of Social Services).

The objective of our audit was to evaluate AFAN's administration and oversight of the CSBG program. Specifically, we reviewed the process AFAN used to evaluate grantee applications, its method for determining the amount of funds to be awarded to each grantee, and its monitoring of the CSBG program's effectiveness.

Our review disclosed two major weaknesses with AFAN's administration and oversight of the CSBG program. Contrary to program requirements, AFAN did not follow established policies and procedures in its technical evaluations of the merits of proposed projects. Program effectiveness was not considered in the evaluation of grantee applications.